Skip to main content
High-level corruption cases in the Western Balkans and Turkey

Vote buying (Dako) - High-level corruption cases in the Western Balkans and Turkey

Vote buying (Dako)

More results

Introduction

Wiretapped conversations from an ongoing investigation by the Serious Crimes Prosecution Office were leaked.

The wiretaps revealed that Vangjush Dako, a three-term mayor of Durrës, member of the Socialist Party Steering Committee at the time, and the party official responsible for the election campaign in Durrës, was part of a scheme to secure votes for the Socialist Party during the June 2017 parliamentary elections in collaboration with a local crime family: the Avdylaj clan.

Country
Albania
Sector
Elections
Offence
Abuse of power
Phase
Investigation

Description of the case

Wiretapped conversations from an ongoing investigation by the Serious Crimes Prosecution Office were leaked.

The wiretaps revealed that Vangjush Dako, a three-term mayor of Durrës, member of the Socialist Party Steering Committee at the time, and the party official responsible for the election campaign in Durrës, was part of a scheme to secure votes for the Socialist Party during the June 2017 parliamentary elections in collaboration with a local crime family: the Avdylaj clan.

Members of the Avdylaj clan engaged in vote-buying and intimidation of state and municipal employees in the district of Durrës. In exchange for helping the Socialist Party to secure votes, the clan was offered preferential access to several local institutions (most notably the local land tenure office).

The clan did benefit from access to local government institutions. Astrit Avdylaj, the most prominent member of the clan, asked Elton Arbana, the chairman of the Socialist Party in the district of Shijak (Durrës region) to intervene by annulling a fine for unauthorised construction that had been imposed by the construction inspectorate of the municipality of Durrës. The wiretaps also indicate that the clan gained access to the local land tenure office.

Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this database. All information is believed to be correct as of December 2020. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts.